Tag: Volatility

There is no magic!

Posted on by Stefan Markus Kremeth

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen

There is no magic! Financial well-being and prosperity need a minimum amount of economic growth.

You know, I received a fair amount of positive feedback to Anton’s article on increased productivity and economic growth thanks to cheap and all time readily available (fossil) energy and again, Ladies and Gentlemen, there is no magic, economic growth demands cheap and 24/7 readily available energy.

… and without economic growth, large parts of populations will not be able of keeping their standard of living on current levels and even less of increasing it, unfortunately there is no magic there either.

I believe if large parts of a population feel economic pressure, eventually those people will want to vent their feelings, and this may lead to unpredictable and inconvenient consequences. The yellow vests movement in France is only one very recent example right in front of our doorsteps.

The cost of such protests is enormous and, there is again no magic, will have to be borne by the country’s population. While the wealthier cohort will not really feel any impact, it is a twist of fate that the less fortunate cohort, the ones that are in the street protesting for a better life, will be hurt even more over time through indirect tax increases, inflation, general increase in cost of living.

The question for me and my readers is how to invest in such an environment. I firmly believe there is again no magic. If you want to have some sort of cash return on your assets in a 0% or negative interest environment, you can get it by accepting volatility. If you are ready to accept volatility you can have easily 4% – 5% cash return on your investments. But volatility is not for everyone. People get very quickly very nervous. Long term statistics show that equities beat bonds but the price you pay for the extra performance of equities over bonds is volatility. No magic, Ladies and Gentlemen! I don’t mind volatility; I prefer low volatility to high volatility, but I don’t really mind it that much.

Besides equities, where do you want to invest your money and receive a cash return if not in equities?

What is your opinion, Ladies and Gentlemen, as Anton did, please share your thoughts, ideas and/or experiences with me and my readers, but please don’t forget (instead of hitting the reply button) to send your messages to:

smk@incrementum.li

Many thanks, indeed!

And now, Ladies and Gentlemen I wish you a great day and weekend.

Kind regards.

Yours truly,

Stefan M. Kremeth
Wealth Management
Incrementum AG

Interview: Mark Valek, The Future of Gold Conference, March 2019

Posted on by Mark Justin Valek

In this interview, conducted by Brecht Arnaert, editor-in-chief of Macrotrends, Mark Valek highlights the differences (and similarities) between crypto and gold, and considers what putting them together can do for smoothing our your potential returns.

Mark Valek: „Gold and Bitcoin: Stronger Together?“

Posted on by Mark Justin Valek

Mark Valek discusses the relationship between gold and crypto-currencies and why combining them into one strategy can form a great position for weathering the coming economic storm.
From “The Future of Gold Conference”, March 2019.

Michael J. Burry

Posted on by Stefan Markus Kremeth

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen
 
Michael J. Burry is an American, physician, investor, and hedge fund manager. He was founder of the hedge fund Scion Capital, which he ran from 2000 until 2008. Burry was one of the first investors to recognize and profit from the subprime mortgage crisis and became famous when he was portrayed in the biographical drama “the big short”.
 
Why would I dedicate my weekly mail to Michael J. Burry you may ask?
 
I got the idea when communicating with Robert, one of my regular readers after my last weekly mail on my personal investment style. The conversation went very much into the direction of the difficulties I am facing when managing my clients’ assets. Prior to the conversation with Robert I have had a similar conversation with David from Australia.
 
What I wrote to them was that the difficulty for me as a money manager is to see and recognise facts that make an investment an interesting one or a not so interesting one. This may seem obvious but with the amount of information available today, I still want to stress the fact that sometimes it is very hard to see the obvious because our mind gets distracted by market “noise” and headlines and maybe colleagues and/or a client who calls and tells me what he just had learned from a friend, etc.. Thus to recognise the obvious and if possible to recognise it ex ante, is not such an apparent thing. Also, and this is utterly important, it is vital not only to see the risks of an investment but potential chances of it as well. As you know, I am getting paid for investing my clients’ assets and for achieving positive results. Looking at the risk side for too long keeps me from seeing chances.
 
I try very hard to stick to my investment principles and to keep all the noise outside of my focus. I do not read investment-advise from banks and brokers and don’t go to their investment meetings. Most of my investment decisions I take on weekends, as I don’t want to be influenced by prices going up and down and I usually inform my partners during our weekly asset allocation meetings on Monday afternoon about my ideas, which I generally implement afterwards. In this respect I am rather focused and structured.
 
…and still, I do make mistakes and I am really not very good at timing the market. But the long-term results nevertheless are rather inspiring. My client’s portfolios show less volatility and better performance in the long run than any of the markets I am investing in. I am only able to capture a part of the gains on the upside (in average roughly 65%) but during difficult periods, downswings, etc. our portfolios are mainly very stable and, in the past, only lost roughly 15% – 35% of what the markets would lose.
 
You know, I think it is important to question one’s investment approach from time to time and make sure that one’s expertise (especially strong expertise) is not holding one back of seeing chances outside the field of expertise. Michael J. Burry was very successful with sticking to his principles and with seeking chances and exploiting opportunities. The mix was perfect at the time.
 
What is your opinion, Ladies and Gentlemen, I am asking you again, will we see a major market correction or soaring markets? Let me know about your investment style and please share your investment experiences with me and my readers, but please don’t forget (instead of hitting the reply button) to send your messages to:
 
smk@incrementum.li
 
Many thanks, indeed!
 
And now, Ladies and Gentlemen I wish you a great day and weekend.

Kind regards
 
Yours truly,

Stefan M. Kremeth
Wealth Management
Incrementum AG

Active Rebalancing of Bitcoin Improves Portfolio Performance

Posted on by Mark Justin Valek

Similar to the gold standard, cryptocurrencies are competing to become the dominant digital store of value protocol. A mixed gold and bitcoin portfolio has had a higher risk-return performance than single asset portfolios because of the low correlation between gold and bitcoin. Combining the gold and bitcoin portfolio with rebalancing bands, allows investors to manage Bitcoin’s volatility and transaction fees on turnover.

Speakers:
Demelza Hays is a research analyst for Incrementum AG and is responsible for the Crypto Research Report published by Incrementum. Moreover, she is developing innovative investment solutions in the field of cryptocurrencies.

Mark Justin Valek is a partner of Incrementum AG and responsible for Portfolio Management and Research.

Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) friendly (Part one)

Posted on by Stefan Markus Kremeth

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen
 
In last week’s part one on ESG investing, I shared some very basic information on ESG investments. Today I would like to point out some of the difficulties one faces when investing in ESG-friendly products. However, the short format of my weekly mail will not allow me to go into the topic very deep, but I am convinced I will make you reflect.
 
Let me start with an interesting and somewhat extreme example. Just imagine you were running a portfolio with an ESG-friendly touch and now just imagine for risk (volatility) reasons you were holding government bonds. No problem you may think, and most investors wouldn’t even think a second about that part of the portfolio. But it strikes me that even though most investment managers who offer ESG-friendly strategies would never invest in a weapons producing company, they are happy to give loans to countries spending enormous amounts of money on weapons of all sorts and sometimes even nuclear devices.
 
Ladies and Gentlemen, by buying government bonds and/or treasuries of the United States of America, Israel, the U.K., China, India, Pakistan, etc. investors are supporting the financing of weapons of mass destruction. The average investor does not think badly about it, I even think the average investor would not think about this at all and yet by buying government bonds and/or treasuries, investors are providing loans to governments, which the respective governments may use to buy and/or build weapons of mass destruction.
 
This is why I am of the opinion that if so called ESG-friendly products contain government bonds and/or treasuries and/or gilts or whatever one wants to call such papers, no truly ESG-friendly investor should touch such products.
 
You see my point, right? When investing in ESG-friendly products you have to be careful because sometimes you do not get what you expect. On the other hand the run on ESG-friendly products is important these days, especially as regulation forces investment managers in that direction. Trouble is, realistically there are simply not enough truly ESG-friendly investments available and therefore investment banks and financial product designers must become “creative”.
 
Anyhow, there is one more thing I want to add. Today everyone is fixed on CO2 emissions even if “greenhouse gases” in general are a much more important factor than CO2 emissions only. By now just about everyone should appreciate the fact that it is greenhouse gases we have to look at because greenhouse gases (GHGs) are absorbing infrared radiation and cause the so-called greenhouse effect. As you may know GHGs are both natural gases, such as carbon dioxide, water vapor, methane, and nitrous oxide, as well as human-made gases, including chloro- and hydro-fluorocarbons. Yet, it is very easy to blame a diesel car taxi driver for polluting our cities but let’s face it keeping for example a house pet for the sheer pleasure of keeping a house pet is probably even worse. According to the Humane Society of the United States, there are 86.4 million cats and 78.2 million dogs in homes around the U.S.. Just imagine, the enormous amount of greenhouse gases the global population of house pets is producing directly and indirectly.
 
Now tell me, why is the media not tackling this issue, why are they so concerned about fossil carburates but do not seem to be considering house pets, or children, farming, etc? I would almost assume, because you cannot win elections by telling the electorate to put to sleep their house pets and to stop reproducing, i.e. stop having children. It is much easier finding one weak opponent – today it’s the diesel car producers and drivers – and bang on their heads until everyone believes that producing diesel cars is the worst thing that ever happened to humanity.
 
What drives me crazy is that large masses of people can be irritated and thus manipulated so easily.
 
Ladies and Gentlemen, I urge you to ask questions, always. Do not just believe what the media and politicians want you to believe. The first ones have only one interest, to catch your attention for as long as possible, like this they can charge higher rates for adds and thus earn more money, the later ones only interest is either to be elected or to be re-elected. This is it! They don’t care about you, they either want your attention to make money or your vote to get power and make money.
 
As always, I encourage you to send me your feedback and/or questions but please don’t forget (instead of hitting the reply button) to send your messages to:
 
smk@incrementum.li
 
Many thanks, indeed!
 
And now, Ladies and Gentlemen I wish you a great day and weekend.
Kind regards,
 
Yours truly,
 

Stefan M. Kremeth
Wealth Management
Incrementum AG

A simple calculation

Posted on by Stefan Markus Kremeth

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen

If you belong to the people who pay their bills primarily in Swiss Francs and/or Euros you belong to a rather large cohort of a few hundred million people living most probably somewhere on the European continent.

Today, I would like to show you with a simple calculation why I prefer equities over bonds.

If you keep your money as liquid and as safe as possible in a bank savings-account (hopefully with a bank offering some sort of government guarantee or at least a bank not getting involved in investment banking and/or corporate debt) or you have it invested in Swiss and/or German government bonds, you, Ladies and Gentlemen, will most probably receive 0% interest. Maybe you will even have to pay a small interest for depositing your money at the bank or for investing it in government bonds of short maturity and in any case, you will have to pay some small banking fees here and there on a regular basis.

This means, in the case of you wanting to invest your money in a Swiss and/or German government bond for 10 years because of its relatively low volatility, you will have to accept 0% interest or in other words no income whatsoever from such an investment and even worse, you will actually lose small bits and pieces of your money (fees) over the entire 10-year period. This truly means that at the end of a 10-year period you have less money than when you started and in real money terms, which means adjusted to purchasing power, you may have lost 10% – 20% due to inflation over that period.

To me this seems not a very attractive investment.

On the other hand, if you invest your money over 10 years in some solid listed company that pays regular annual dividends of 4.5%, thanks to the effect of compounding you will receive some 50% return over the same period. True, you will most probably have to accept higher volatility, but doesn’t the proposed return deliver an incentive high enough to accept such volatility?

Ladies and Gentlemen, to me it does!

Now, I know this is a very simplified calculation but both examples are real and possible in today’s market environment. Solid company delivering 4.5% dividend yield on one side and 0% 10-year government bond on the other side.

Think about it!

As always, I encourage you to send me your feedback and/or questions but please don’t forget (instead of hitting the reply button) to send your messages to:

smk@incrementum.li

Many thanks, indeed!

And now, Ladies and Gentlemen I wish you a great day and weekend.

Kind regards,

Yours truly,

Stefan M. Kremeth
Wealth Management
Incrementum AG

Zuri Invest Gala Dinner November 2018: “In Gold We Trust” With Ronald Stöferle

Posted on by Ronald Stöferle

Ronald Stöferle gives a speech ” In Gold we Trust” at Zuri Invest Gala Dinner.

He is discussing the following:
1) Status Quo
2) A turn of Tide in Monetary Policy
3) A turn of Tode in the Global Monetary Architecture
4 ) Gold Stocks
5) Conclusion: Quo Vadis, Aurum?

What can be expected?

Posted on by Stefan Markus Kremeth

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen

I was asked by one of my readers to elaborate my view on what can be expected by financial markets until year end? I am happy to do so, but please keep in mind that this is my very personal view and that I can’t foresee the future.

Statistically the best two quarters of the year just started. Additionally, in years of mid-term elections in the U.S. the chances of a yearend rally are fairly good. Moreover, after the recent market slide followed by an impressive rise, the chart technics all of a sudden show some potential for further improvements.

Does this mean everything is fine? No, of course it doesn’t, but for the time being interest rate increases seem to be priced in, trade war fears seem to be priced in, political changes in Germany (CDU/CSU’s and SPD’s massive losses) and in the U.S. (democrats take control of the house) seem to be priced in.

I personally believe we will still see volatility but I would be surprised not to see markets moving higher in the weeks to come. I first expect a short consolidation during the next days and thereafter further increases.
Now, what does this situation teach us? I think that some scare tactics by media and so-called “financial experts” have led to some very unpleasant situations during the last weeks. Panicking investors have sold their equities at the bottom of the market just to see them going up, in the last few days.
Look, Ladies and Gentlemen, 2018 so far is a very special year, we had two 10% crashes in the Standard & Poor’s Index within the past 10 months and we are still not in what is called a bear market, this didn’t happen since the mid 50ties.
But even if we eventually enter a bear market, which we will as bear markets just happen from time to time, this may be seen as normal market behaviour. You know, bear markets happen in average every 3.5 years and last for approximately one year. That is – I admit an unpleasant – part of investing, but so what. If you stick to your investments (as long as they are solid and net free cashflow producing) and if your investments pay dividends, you can always collect the dividends, spend the money or reinvest and wait until your stocks go up again. Just don’t let yourself get too excited.

Please never forget, investing is a long-term exercise and please never forget market corrections are normal, a common thing to happen. The link below shows you a table published by Wikipedia with stock market crashes and bear markets and as you will see, there were many and nevertheless we are still alive and kicking:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_stock_market_crashes_and_bear_markets

Please do not hesitate to share your thoughts with me on the interview or on whatever seems interesting or bothering to you. Please feel encouraged to do so but please don’t forget (instead of hitting the reply button) to send your messages to:

smk@incrementum.li

Many thanks, indeed!

And now, Ladies and Gentlemen I wish you a great day and weekend.

Kind regards.

Yours truly,

Stefan M. Kremeth
Wealth Management
Incrementum AG