“Die Nullzins Falle”

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen

Due to the Easter weekend I decided not to send out my weekly last Friday.

Now, today I would like to mention a book called “Die Nullzins Falle”. My partner Ronald P. Stöferle acted as one of the three co-authors of the book. As the title suggests “Die Nullzins Falle” describes the authors’ views on long-term socio-economic effects of the current ultra-low interest rates. The book takes on purpose a rather critical view and intends to elaborate on the riskier, more unpleasant, maybe even dangerous side of current monetary policies.

The book certainly makes an interesting read and it can be ordered in any online bookstore under the ISBN number: 978-3-95972-019-9.

These days I receive a fair number of messages and phone calls from private clients and investors. As we are approaching new highs in the markets one part of the people calling me or writing to me suggests a sudden market crash, while the other half is seeing even higher prices.

I simply don’t know where the markets are heading but I must admit I like taking profits and that is exactly what I am doing now. I sell bits and pieces here and there. I am selling small positions into the strength. Taking profits is a very satisfying thing to do and even if I may miss out on another up-move, I simply don’t care. Just to be clear, I am not liquidating any portfolio but am rather selling very small positions here and there and only into the strength.

While I am currently a net seller of equities, I am still a buyer of equities of companies that seem somewhat out of favour. However, even the companies I am currently considering as add-ons to the portfolios always have to be net free cash-flow positive and not suffering from any negative structural issues. Sticking to that rule I might have to wait a little until such companies’ equities will be traded up again at some time in the future but until then the positive cash-flows will deliver cash returns on capital invested.

What is your opinion, will we see a major market correction or soaring markets? Let me know about your investment style and please share your investment experiences with me and my readers, but please don’t forget (instead of hitting the reply button) to send your messages to:

smk@incrementum.li

Many thanks, indeed!

And now, Ladies and Gentlemen I wish you a great day and weekend.
 
Kind regards,

Stefan M. Kremeth
Wealth Management
Incrementum AG

Launch of new Crypto Research Report – Interview with Mark J. Valek

The quarterly Crypto Research Report is the leading authority on crypto currencies and blockchain investments for financial market participants and institutions. Each issue includes exclusive interviews, statistical analysis of different crypto currencies and helpful insights into the most interesting and frequently asked questions of the time.

Content:
1:10 Market overview
2:40 Interview with Mark Valek
24:33 Flashnews
27:46 Link of the day

Launch of new Crypto Research Report – Interview Mark J. Valek
https://cryptoresearch.report/?lang

Yield or how to receive cashflows in a negative yield environment

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen

I received a few mails on my very provocative statement that house pets, farming and children produce an enormous amount of greenhouse gases. I was provocative on purpose. It was my intention to trigger some reactions.

I received two mails on the indirect financing of (nuclear) weapons via government bonds. It seemed most of my readers were never really looking at it that way. Fact is that you will never know what a government is doing with the money you pass on to them when subscribing to one of their bonds. They may buy weapons or build a children’s hospital with it – it is entirely up to them.

I generally receive several mails per month from readers asking me how they should invest their money to achieve the best possible results. As always, I can’t tell you and I am not allowed to give any advice to you just like that, but I am happy to elaborate quickly on what I think seems a decent strategy to still get some yield in a negative yield environment. You know, Ladies and Gentlemen, my goal always is to receive cashflow with limited volatility.

Some of my readers already know about my investment style. My investment style is real asset based and enjoys a rather large equity portion. However, the equity portion is limited to equities of companies producing positive net free cashflows and I like rebalancing the position in my clients’ portfolios from time to time.

This means I define a “normal” weighting, i.e. around 5% for any equity position in a portfolio and harvest the dividends or capital reductions the underlying company shares with its investors. If the price of an equities-position appreciates over time and thus the weighting within the client’s portfolio goes up, I will start cutting back the position down to its initial 5% weighting. If, however, the price of an investment goes down and I can’t find any dramatic change in the strategic and/or earnings perspective and the company still produces positive net free cashflows, I harvest the cashflows and increase the position until it reaches its intended weighting of 5%.

The result of this strategy is astonishing. Volatility decreases massively and performance increases.

When markets are moving up, we only capture a part of the positive performance, because we like to keep a large cash position at hand. But when markets are going down, we usually only lose a fraction of what the market loses. It is during the down moves that we generate alpha. You can have a look at the monthly development of one of our portfolios on our website.

https://www.incrementum.li/en/wealth-management/

It still needs the “right” equities and this is probably the most difficult part. Please let me know about your investment style and please share your investment experiences with me and my readers, but please don’t forget (instead of hitting the reply button) to send your messages to:

smk@incrementum.li

Many thanks, indeed!

And now, Ladies and Gentlemen I wish you a great day and weekend.
 

Kind regards,

Stefan M. Kremeth
Wealth Management
Incrementum AG

Active Rebalancing of Bitcoin Improves Portfolio Performance

Similar to the gold standard, cryptocurrencies are competing to become the dominant digital store of value protocol. A mixed gold and bitcoin portfolio has had a higher risk-return performance than single asset portfolios because of the low correlation between gold and bitcoin. Combining the gold and bitcoin portfolio with rebalancing bands, allows investors to manage Bitcoin’s volatility and transaction fees on turnover.

Speakers:
Demelza Hays is a research analyst for Incrementum AG and is responsible for the Crypto Research Report published by Incrementum. Moreover, she is developing innovative investment solutions in the field of cryptocurrencies.

Mark Justin Valek is a partner of Incrementum AG and responsible for Portfolio Management and Research.

Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) friendly (Part one)

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen
 
In last week’s part one on ESG investing, I shared some very basic information on ESG investments. Today I would like to point out some of the difficulties one faces when investing in ESG-friendly products. However, the short format of my weekly mail will not allow me to go into the topic very deep, but I am convinced I will make you reflect.
 
Let me start with an interesting and somewhat extreme example. Just imagine you were running a portfolio with an ESG-friendly touch and now just imagine for risk (volatility) reasons you were holding government bonds. No problem you may think, and most investors wouldn’t even think a second about that part of the portfolio. But it strikes me that even though most investment managers who offer ESG-friendly strategies would never invest in a weapons producing company, they are happy to give loans to countries spending enormous amounts of money on weapons of all sorts and sometimes even nuclear devices.
 
Ladies and Gentlemen, by buying government bonds and/or treasuries of the United States of America, Israel, the U.K., China, India, Pakistan, etc. investors are supporting the financing of weapons of mass destruction. The average investor does not think badly about it, I even think the average investor would not think about this at all and yet by buying government bonds and/or treasuries, investors are providing loans to governments, which the respective governments may use to buy and/or build weapons of mass destruction.
 
This is why I am of the opinion that if so called ESG-friendly products contain government bonds and/or treasuries and/or gilts or whatever one wants to call such papers, no truly ESG-friendly investor should touch such products.
 
You see my point, right? When investing in ESG-friendly products you have to be careful because sometimes you do not get what you expect. On the other hand the run on ESG-friendly products is important these days, especially as regulation forces investment managers in that direction. Trouble is, realistically there are simply not enough truly ESG-friendly investments available and therefore investment banks and financial product designers must become “creative”.
 
Anyhow, there is one more thing I want to add. Today everyone is fixed on CO2 emissions even if “greenhouse gases” in general are a much more important factor than CO2 emissions only. By now just about everyone should appreciate the fact that it is greenhouse gases we have to look at because greenhouse gases (GHGs) are absorbing infrared radiation and cause the so-called greenhouse effect. As you may know GHGs are both natural gases, such as carbon dioxide, water vapor, methane, and nitrous oxide, as well as human-made gases, including chloro- and hydro-fluorocarbons. Yet, it is very easy to blame a diesel car taxi driver for polluting our cities but let’s face it keeping for example a house pet for the sheer pleasure of keeping a house pet is probably even worse. According to the Humane Society of the United States, there are 86.4 million cats and 78.2 million dogs in homes around the U.S.. Just imagine, the enormous amount of greenhouse gases the global population of house pets is producing directly and indirectly.
 
Now tell me, why is the media not tackling this issue, why are they so concerned about fossil carburates but do not seem to be considering house pets, or children, farming, etc? I would almost assume, because you cannot win elections by telling the electorate to put to sleep their house pets and to stop reproducing, i.e. stop having children. It is much easier finding one weak opponent – today it’s the diesel car producers and drivers – and bang on their heads until everyone believes that producing diesel cars is the worst thing that ever happened to humanity.
 
What drives me crazy is that large masses of people can be irritated and thus manipulated so easily.
 
Ladies and Gentlemen, I urge you to ask questions, always. Do not just believe what the media and politicians want you to believe. The first ones have only one interest, to catch your attention for as long as possible, like this they can charge higher rates for adds and thus earn more money, the later ones only interest is either to be elected or to be re-elected. This is it! They don’t care about you, they either want your attention to make money or your vote to get power and make money.
 
As always, I encourage you to send me your feedback and/or questions but please don’t forget (instead of hitting the reply button) to send your messages to:
 
smk@incrementum.li
 
Many thanks, indeed!
 
And now, Ladies and Gentlemen I wish you a great day and weekend.
Kind regards,
 
Yours truly,
 

Stefan M. Kremeth
Wealth Management
Incrementum AG