Ronald Stoferle – Next Crisis Will Be a Crisis of Our Monetary System

Silber Bullion TV speaks with returning guest, Ronald Stoferle of Incrementum AG, about what he observed about Chinese attitude towards gold during his recent visit to Shanghai for the China International Precious Metals Annual Conference.

Discussed in this interview:

03:18 Chinese economy is struggling

05:38 China & US: Which country needs the other more?

09:48 China debt addiction and economy

13:41 Chinese Yuan to be the next reserve currency?

21:05 De-dollarization: Is the dollar’s reserve currency status under threat?

24:37 Petrol yuan: Saudi to accept Yuan payments for oil?

28:08 Outlook for gold 2019

32:44 Oktoberfest beer to gold ratio

Ronald Stöferle – Author of In Gold we Trust Report talks predictions and China’S role in gold markets

In an episode of The Expat Money Show, Ronald Stöferle, author of In Gold We Trust Report talks about the relationship between The Austrian School of Economics and The Gold Standard.  Also, China’s Role In Gold Markets, and his Gold Prediction 2019.

Click here to listen the audio file:

Investing like the ultimative pros

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen

Many thanks for all the replies I received to my last weekly. I collected some pretty detailed answers and it seems there are some well-informed people among my readers. Thank you very much!

Let me give you a somewhat different perspective on what may signify long-term investing. I am deliberately simplifying wherever possible to make this easy to read..

Now, the biggest challenge in answering my last week’s question seemed to be the definition of “long-term”, which I believe represents one of the most important factors in managing pension fund assets.

One may argue that as a cohort, pension fund managers can probably be considered the ultimate pros, at least that is what they ought to be and a pension fund – by definition – needs to be invested very, very long-term which means pension fund managers need to find and concentrate on very long-term investments.

Here in Liechtenstein, same is true for Switzerland, employees usually follow a three-pillar pension saving scheme. Let me elaborate quickly:

Pillar one is a compulsory and defined benefit pension scheme by the government. Contributions are taken off any salary at any time during an employee’s working life. Employees know exactly what they are getting according to the number of years contributing. Pillar one only covers basic living costs it is capped but also has a floor in order to assure that every citizen, no matter of his/her contribution can rely on a minimal pension income after retirement. Investment risk is born by the government, i.e. tax payer.
Pillar two is in most cases structured as a defined benefit pension scheme. It is compulsory as well, however not organised by the government but rather by employers. Depending on how much an employee can contribute during his/her working life and depending on the investment style and long-term performance of the pension fund manager, the final pension income may vary, and it does – even big time. Investment risk is born by employees (policy holders),
Pillar three is discretionary and may be organised by employees themselves. Up to a certain amount there are tax benefits for contributors.

The by far largest part of pension scheme money is invested in pillar number one and two. This money is being invested globally and at least sometimes in accordance with the latest academic notion of modern investment principals. The investing process is supervised by local authorities/regulators.

So far so good.

If an employee starts working at the age of 20 and works until the age of 65, which is currently the regular retirement age for male employees in Liechtenstein and Switzerland, the employee contributes 45 years of monthly pension fund premiums or “savings”. The savings need to be invested and allocated in a way to keep returns as high as possible and volatility over the entire investment period as low as possible. The investment period is defined by the years any employee contributes, i.e. in our example 45 years plus the years the employee lives after retirement and receives his/her pension income. If a male employee lives until the age of 85, hence the investment period amounts to 45 years plus 20 years and therefore 65 years in total. In our example after retirement and during the last 20 years of the employee’s life, the employee now starts consuming the accumulated returns and savings.

Most of the answers I have received to my last weekly were not taking that sort of ultra long-term investment horizon into consideration. From a behavioural investment point of view this is totally understandable as our mind weighs short-term news and noise higher than long-term considerations. This can be explained psychologically, and research in this field has led to many academic papers and even a Nobel Prize in economics.

However, the quality of a pension fund manager is also (but not only) defined by how strongly he can resist short-term speculation and thus his ability to blank out anything keeping him off the track generating truly tong-term returns for his clients, i.e. pension fund policy holders.

Accordingly, quarterly earnings reports, political turmoil, tweeting politicians and trade wars can not be taken into the equation. A pension fund portfolio needs to be invested in a way that focuses on cash-flow generation over decades. Anything else would be speculation.

Just think about it, a pension fund manager can of course not foresee the future and can neither invest with the current partial U.S. government shut-down, the next financial crisis an equity bull market nor the next recession in mind. The only thing a pension fund manager can do is to use models that calculate potential return needs over the entire investment period taking underlying inflation estimates and development of demographics into the equation and than start to look for investment opportunities that match such return needs, if possible over the entire investment life cycle.

Therefore the positive side of investing really long-term is that pension fund managers don’t really need to consider daily, weekly and quarterly earnings estimates and even micro- and macro-economic comments by analysts. They don’t care about the “longest” U.S. government shut-down because even if it lasts for another few months it is just not long enough to be considered in the investment process. Any equity market crash is only a down-tick on a 65-year chart. Recession-, inflation-, deflation-fears never last 65 years, elected political leaders come and go, regulation and deregulation cycles are shorter than a 65 years investment horizon and thus even trade wars dwindle down to non-events.

Interesting perspective, no?

Now, Ladies and Gentlemen, I will try to find a pension fund manager to discuss my views on pension fund investing and hope to be able to publish a short interview within the upcoming weeks, and I encourage you to send me your feedback as always but please don’t forget (instead of hitting the reply button) to send your messages to:

smk@incrementum.li

Many thanks, indeed!

And now, Ladies and Gentlemen I wish you a great day and weekend.
Kind regards.
Yours truly,

Stefan M. Kremeth
Wealth Management
Incrementum AG

Incrementum Inflation Signal: Reversal To “Rising Inflation” – Interpretation and Investment Impact

Dear investors, advisory board members and friends,

We hereby want to inform you that as of the beginning of January, our proprietary inflation indicator has switched from “FALLING INFLATION” to a full blown “RISING INFLATION” signal.

In the following please find a detailed analysis and interpretation of the Inflation Signal and our current macro thoughts, as well as the impact on the investment process.

Ladies and gentlemen, we believe that current valuations in inflation sensitive assets are a tremendous buying opportunity which we want to utilize.

Best regards,

Mark J. Valek & Ronald-Peter Stoeferle
Incrementum AG

What would you do?

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen

Just imagine you were managing a multi-billion pension fund with thousands of policy holders expecting you to deliver sufficient returns in order to grant to them a pension that will allow them to pay their bills once will be retired.

What would you do? How would you allocate the money that was entrusted to you?

Ladies and Gentlemen, the largest investors on this planet are pension funds. They invest their policy holders’ money either directly or via mandates. Mandates means the pension funds give the policy holder’s money to banks, brokers, asset managers who then manage parts of the pension funds’ portfolios. Both approaches have their pros and cons but this is not part of today’s weekly.

Now, every month there is new money from pension fund policyholders’ (premiums deducted from salaries) arriving at the pension funds. Furthermore many economies still count growing working populations. This means new workers/employees joining pension funds, which again leads to more money to be managed. This money needs to be invested and it needs to yield a positive return over time. Frankly speaking, this is quite a challenge. In an environment of ultra-low or even negative interest rates, macro-economic uncertainty, and political threats, investors prefer to keep their powder dry before investing. However, eventually a pension fund manager needs to invest as cash on accounts may yield negatively, not to mention inflation, as low as it may be, it should still be that any sort of investment return covers at least underlying inflation.

I personally believe it is always interesting to think about where the largest investors, who not only manage unbelievable amounts of money but on top of that and by definition need to follow a very long-term approach, put their money.

I am curious and this is why I am asking you to let me know how you would invest your policy holders’ money, if you were a pension fund manager. I will consolidate your suggestions/ideas and then let’s see what comes out of it. Maybe we can draw conclusions from this for our own investment style.

Now, Ladies and Gentlemen, I encourage you to send me your concise ideas but please don’t forget (instead of hitting the reply button) to send your messages to:

smk@incrementum.li

Many thanks, indeed!

And now, Ladies and Gentlemen I wish you a great day and weekend.

Kind regards.

Yours truly,

Stefan M. Kremeth
Wealth Management
Incrementum AG

Financial Markets are Indifferent

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen
Welcome to 2019!
May this be a year of good health, interesting encounters and plenty of happy moments for you and your loved ones.

In this first weekly of the year, I would like to take up the issue of last year’s sell-off which occurred during the month of December. I was quite impressed and even more intrigued by what happened and the way it happened.

It was striking to see the media reaction to the sell-off, with comments and vocabulary referring to financial markets almost as if financial markets were humans, a bunch of nasty, mean and hostile guys taking away investor’s money. Quite frankly I believe the sell-off became a self-fulfilling prophecy created by media, financial experts, so-called financial experts and finally the man in the street.

Fact is, financial markets are neither hostile nor friendly they are just indifferent.

Because markets in general (including financial markets) are nothing more than places to exchange goods for goods and/or goods for money during defined times, that’s all. They were actually designed to make life easier for buyers and sellers and therefore with the comfort of humans in mind.

However, most of the market participants on the other side are real human beings  (only most because there are also algo-trading-programs)and as such they are biased, nervous, short tempered, greedy, anxious, happy, educated, uneducated everything you want. Market participants get influenced by noise, media, brokers and many other factors and create hypes and sell-offs. This, as fortunate or unfortunate it may seem (depending on ones perspective or personal positioning), is normal, it’s just the way we – humans – are. It is always interesting to see how quickly we can change from being confident to being anxious and that is not only true when it comes to investments. It is pure psychology and probably dates back to the time when homo erectus started to rover the grounds.

Why would I make a point of this, because I believe that during sell-offs, like the one we have just experienced in December 2018 but also many other sell-offs many times before, there is a mismatch between the fears of crashing financial markets and the real intrinsic risk of failure of the companies whose shares are actually traded on a given financial market (stock exchange).

If you are able to detect such a mismatch and if you have the courage to go against your own fear and step in to buy equities of companies you assessed in the past and considered worthwhile owning and thus always wanted and still want to own anyway, you may get them at interesting prices, possibly enjoying price appreciation over time. Pension funds are typically buying during and after sell-offs. With their very long-term investment horizon they are predestined to buy and hold and while holding, harvesting dividends.

Ladies and Gentlemen, please keep in mind that I can’t foresee the future and that I only try to apply some common sense and that whatever I am sharing with you in my weekly mails reflects my very own personal opinion and please keep on sharing your thoughts and ideas with me. Please feel encouraged to do so but please don’t forget (instead of hitting the reply button) to send your messages to:

smk@incrementum.li
Many thanks, indeed!

And now, Ladies and Gentlemen I wish you a great day and weekend.

Kind regards.

Yours truly,

 

Stefan M. Kremeth
Wealth Management
Incrementum AG