Collective Outrage II

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen

Many thanks for your feedbacks. It seems I am not the only one concerned. Unfortunately I am unable to publish all the very valuable comments I received. Before sharing some or at least extracts of them, allow me to mention that many of you indicated a disturbing feeling of ever-increasing moralizing arguments in political debates. I almost get the impression that the weaker an argument the higher the moralizing part in a debate becomes. Unfortunately this phenomenon can be detected across all political parties and/or interest groups.

Let me start with David:

“Yes Stefan, I fully agree with your summation. “Collective outrage” is indeed a new phenomenon, and it appears to be managed by special-interest groups and social media to persuade society at large to conform to the “politically correct” or ideologically expedient consensus. Some of these mass circulations are just naive oversimplifications. Others are gross falsehoods, which repeated often enough become the “truth” for large sectors of the population. Freedom of thought is actively discouraged, making it easier for a certain breed of politicians, economists and malcontents to manipulate public opinion.”

Thank you, David! Many of us are intrigued by the “power” modern mass media or better, the ones who know how to use them, have over public opinion.

Let me continue with Kelly:

“In general I agree with your sentiment. I would only add that people are also social creatures. As such, community is important. Community being a group of people that share enough common values and interests to cooperate with one another toward common ends. This leads me to the thought that nations of millions that attempt top down rule will always be pushing a string vs. pulling. Peaceful communities are achieved through voluntary cooperation; because people are so unique, I believe, it is unreasonable to think that millions of unique individuals will have enough in common to voluntarily cooperate on enough subjects to form a mutually beneficial cohesive society. I believe smaller communities that govern their common interests through direct democracy are better suited to peaceful existence. Alliances can be built between communities that address trade and security while leaving the majority of governance within the smaller communities. Final thought: when the will of one is imposed on the will of another, disharmony and conflict are assured.”

I couldn’t agree more. Thank you, Kelly!

And now, Anton, my friend and research partner in a paper on “risk shift in pension schemes”:

“I’m so glad that more people are seeing these phenomena (Ray Dario spoke about something similar in one of his recent LinkedIn posts). This course of action has been in acceleration for the past 10 years but has much longer roots (I highly recommend the book called Public Opinion by Walter Lippmann). The core of the problem as I see it is a betrayal of trust by politicians, scientists, teachers, journalists and religious people: all the core institutions of our socio-economic order have betrayed the implied trust in them – we trust them to “guide” us in exchange for them having the freedom to do so. When that trust is placed secondary to vested interests, under the cheap veil of “nothing is true, everything is permitted” (a postmodern narrative), then things start to go downhill. I personally see no simple solution. I believe that change comes forcefully: I don’t see “leaders” coming together, putting their differences aside and dealing with the many, many issues that we face. They will play the moral card and the outrage card as long as they stay in power: power has always been the archenemy of progress for it needs rigid structures.” 

Thank you very much Anton, always a pleasure exchanging ideas and working together with you! I hope you don’t mind me having had to cut short your extensive assessment.

Ladies and Gentlemen, please do not hesitate sending in your comments. Next week we will be looking at financial markets.

Please let me know your views and reply to my thoughts, but if you are sharing your viewpoints, please don’t forget (instead of hitting the reply button) to send your messages to:

smk@incrementum.li

Many thanks, indeed!

Ladies and Gentlemen, I wish you a great day and weekend.

Kind regards.

Yours truly,

Stefan M. Kremeth
Wealth Management
Incrementum AG

Tel.: +423 237 26 60
Cell: +41 79 303 48 39
Im alten Riet 102
9494 Schaan/Liechtenstein
Mail: smk@incrementum.li
Web: www.incrementum.li

Collective Outrage

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen

Many thanks for the messages I received during the course of the week on today’s topic. Only by announcing it last week, I already triggered a fair amount of intriguing feedbacks.

The majority of messages I received was covering what I would call “personal outrage” or maybe “private outrage” and I do share a lot of sympathy for the stories I received but they were slightly off what I had in mind. I am interested in a phenomenon I call “collective outrage”, something I did not notice as much when I was young, but which is bothering me now that I am getting older.

Ladies and Gentlemen, I am referring to something I notice in debates among family members, fiends and in public debates, etc.

Let me kick-off with a brief idea of mine. I am very much convinced that pretty much every human being is different from another one, i.e. human beings are mostly and truly individual. Due to the socio-cultural environment we were brought up in, live in and want to belong to, but also due to our education, experiences, hopes and dreams, we think and feel maybe more or probably less like other people in the various cohorts we belong to or see ourselves belonging to. Considering this, I think it would be an unbelievable coincidence to exactly think, feel and believe like someone else, another person. Maybe there are cross sections, larger or smaller but identical thinking, feeling, believing seems improbable to me.

Now, if we presume my thought to be vaguely legitimate, wouldn’t it be totally normal, natural to have many diverse opinions on about nearly everything? And wouldn’t it be totally normal, natural to be allowed to share such opinion without having to think about consequences?

I think it would and I think it should and yet it is not, unfortunately not.

Certain interest groups are occupying specific topics and manage them in a way that is worrisome to me because they are trying to imply theis own moral standards by not accepting the fact that other people may have different opinions, feelings, thoughts on one and the same topic and even worse (and this is closing the circle to today’s topic) create a culture of what I call “collective outrage” by blaming people of being of different opinion. I think this is unacceptable, especially in a democratic environment, because such behaviour kills free and individual thinking and collective debates and eventually democracy. One does not necessarily always have to like what ones hears or sees at all times and unless it is against the law and/or good taste (and this is very subjective) different opinion can be refreshing, interesting, eye-opening or at least lead to some additional thinking.

Ladies and Gentlemen, what do you think?

Please let me know your views and reply to my thoughts, but if you are sharing your viewpoints, please don’t forget (instead of hitting the reply button) to send your messages to:

smk@incrementum.li

Many thanks, indeed!

Ladies and Gentlemen, I wish you a great day and weekend.

Kind regards.

Yours truly,

Stefan M. Kremeth
Wealth Management
Incrementum AG

Tel.: +423 237 26 60
Cell: +41 79 303 48 39
Im alten Riet 102
9494 Schaan/Liechtenstein
Mail: smk@incrementum.li
Web: www.incrementum.li

Financial Crisis Yes or No, Readers’ Views / Collective Outrage

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen

Today I would like to share some readers’ feedback on my question from two weeks ago: “are we going to see another Great Financial Crisis, or will we see perfect markets for another decade?

Now, the consensus certainly is going into the somewhat expected direction of “difficult markets”. One of the only contrarian views came from my good friend Andy, CIO of a large Swiss pension fund. The reason for this can be found in the fact that Andy enjoys great insight into the world of Swiss pension funds, which ranks among the largest on a global scale. As CIO of a multi-billion fund he shares the concerns of the entire industry on missing returns from fixed income and (these days) even on new investments in real estate. One of the alternatives still delivering positive cash returns (no matter the volatility) can still be found in equities markets.

And you know what, Andy has a point, with a cumulated cash position of roughly CHF 65 billion the Swiss pension funds lose millions in negative interest rates every month and this “cost” is born by us, i.e. the pension fund policy holders. Please think about it, Ladies and Gentlemen.

My friend Robert is seeing a crisis at the horizon but is careful about any timing indication as this is difficult if not impossible to foresee. The main arguments for his scenario are inflation, rising interest rates and a massive currency devaluation, which according to his views will become a problem for a long time.

John also sees another financial crisis approaching. He argues that not only the problems of the last crisis have not been addressed adequately but on top of that the steep increase in global debt levels have made them even worse. David certainly shares that view and sees inflation and rising rates and a massive currency devaluation and thus sees no chance that the new decade will be anything like the last one. He adds that the already crippling burden of insurmountable debt is increasing by the day; the demographic outlook in advanced economies is grim; democracy is being rendered dysfunctional by political ineptitude and polarization and that domestic unrest and international confrontation do not augur well for a global economy kept afloat by absurdly low interest rates and the deluge of liquidity created out of thin air. Wow, what a statement.

Thank you very much, Gentlemen (there were unfortunately no Ladies offering any feedback) for submitting your views on the topic. Due to the format of this weekly mail I was unable to publish all the answers I had received, but I think I covered most of the views that were shared with us. Please keep it up.

Now, debt is of concern to many of my readers and I certainly share a lot of sympathy for these concerns, but maybe I am missing a point?

Next week or the week after I would like to look at a phenomenon which bothers me more and more. I am thinking of what I would call “collective outrage”. Please feel free to already send in your views to this or just wait and reply to my thoughts. In any case, if you are sharing your view points, please don’t forget (instead of hitting the reply button) to send your messages to:

smk@incrementum.li

Many thanks, indeed!

Ladies and Gentlemen, I wish you a great day and weekend.

Kind regards.

Yours truly,

Stefan M. Kremeth
Wealth Management
Incrementum AG

Tel.: +423 237 26 60
Cell: +41 79 303 48 39
Im alten Riet 102
9494 Schaan/Liechtenstein
Mail: smk@incrementum.li
Web: www.incrementum.li

New Product

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen

Today I would like to introduce you to a new product, which one of my partners will be launching for Incrementum in due course. I truly hope you don’t mind, but I think the product is interesting, even if only available to professional investors.

Please enjoy the following truly concise introduction to the product by my partner Mark J. Valek:

“On February 19, Incrementum is launching an innovative and uncorrelated investment strategy. The investment success is independent of further rising stock markets as the strategy invests in cryptocurrencies and gold.

These are the key facts:

By combining “digital” and physical gold, the investment fund serves investors as a portfolio building block, which as a diversifier excellently complements a traditional investment portfolio.

The strategic asset allocation of 75% gold and 25% cryptocurrencies significantly dampens the high volatility of cryptocurrencies.

The rule-based rebalancing results in regular profit-taking from price gains in cryptocurrencies.

Additional income is generated through systematic “covered call writing” of listed Bitcoin options.

The implementation is cost-efficient and in compliance with the most secure custody standards.

The Strategy will be set up as AIF for professional investors.

As part of a seeding program, we are offering attractive fees during the seeding phase. The subscription period ends on February 14, 2020. If you are interested, please feel free to contact us and we will be happy to send you further information.”

Please let me know what you think, Ladies and Gentlemen. Next week I will share with you the feedback from my readers on my last week’s question: “are we going to see another Great Financial Crisis, or will we see perfect markets for another decade?”

…and please don’t forget (instead of hitting the reply button) to send your messages to:

smk@incrementum.li

Many thanks, indeed!

Ladies and Gentlemen, I wish you a great day and weekend.

Kind regards.

Yours truly,

Stefan M. Kremeth
Wealth Management
Incrementum AG

Tel.: +423 237 26 60
Cell: +41 79 303 48 39
Im alten Riet 102
9494 Schaan/Liechtenstein
Mail: smk@incrementum.li
Web: www.incrementum.li

Recession Free Decade

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen

Who would have thought that right after the Great Financial Crisis we would see the first decade ever without a U.S. recession? More than ten years have passed since the end of the last U.S. recession, which happened in July 2009. The decade that just ended is actually the first one without a U.S. recession since the U.S. declaration of independence in 1776.

One can easily argue that the monetary policies of the U.S. Federal Reserve and other central banks certainly helped. True, this certainly helped.

Nevertheless, there are many people out there who completely misjudged the situation over the last decade and probably also missed most of the markets’ upside.

Overall, Ladies and Gentlemen, it is also clear that the global economy expanded more strongly in the 75 year period after World War II than ever before. Reasons for this can be found amongst other things in  an “end of war” relieve, infrastructure investments, ground-breaking inventions and population growth. Another economic success story came from some countries in the Far East. This has been particularly true for China where over the last 20 years hundreds of millions of people have risen from poverty to middle class. Keep in mind that the West also benefited big time from this effect.

Therefore one can easily state that the circumstances leading to this recession-free decade in the U.S. were certainly very positive and exceptional and now, today, I am asking myself, if we will see another such positive and exceptional decade or if we will see dampening effects from low interest rates, over-indebted public- and private households, over-ageing populations in G20 nations, pension reforms leading to lower disposable incomes and thus dampening effects on private consumption, lower growth rates from the typical silicon valley companies leading to a dampening base effect and, and ,and.

I am usually a rather positive person but currently I am cautious. Another reason for being cautious is that we have been looking at research analysing consensus forward guidance of large investment banks, brokers, analysts and asset managers. You probably are aware that the people working for such organisations are very skilled, well-educated and they do nothing else but analysing macro and micro economic data, simulating models and taking assumptions. This is their job and it certainly is a very interesting one.

Yet, and strangely enough the majority of those analysts believes that we will not see any big changes in the markets and/or economy in the near-term future. Depending on the market (macro economics, precious metals, currencies, bonds, equities, commodities, etc) there are consensus deviations, but overall the picture is astonishingly homogeneous. If we take the average from the data we have looked at, we will recognise an expectation for modest economic growth and modest positive market performance.

Now, and this is why I am slightly cautious at this very moment, I have the impression that the average almost never happens. I have no statistical evidence backing my impression but thinking back. I can’t recall any such economic research consensus having materialised.

Please let me know what you think, Ladies and Gentlemen, are we going to see another Great Financial Crisis, or will we see perfect markets for another decade? Please share your thoughts, but please don’t forget (instead of hitting the reply button) to send your messages to:

smk@incrementum.li

Many thanks, indeed!

Ladies and Gentlemen, I wish you a great day and weekend.

Kind regards.

Yours truly,

Stefan M. Kremeth
Wealth Management
Incrementum AG

Tel.: +423 237 26 60
Cell: +41 79 303 48 39
Im alten Riet 102
9494 Schaan/Liechtenstein
Mail: smk@incrementum.li
Web: www.incrementum.li

Year-End Competition …and the winner is…

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen!

Welcome in 2020! May 2020 be a prosperous, an interesting and a friendly one for all of us.

Today I am happy to announce the winner of our year-end competition. The goal was to guess the year-end prices for one ounce of gold in USD, for the S&P 500 and for one ounce of silver in USD. I looked up the prices on: https://marktdaten.fuw.ch/ and compared them to all the suggestions in all the emails I had received at the time. The year-end prices were the following:

Gold:  1’517.40                                Silver:  17.86                        S&P:  3’230.78

Congratulations! You did a great job at foreseeing at least one or two out of the three year-end closing prices. For every person who participated in the competition I calculated the price deviation in % each for gold, silver and the S&P, added those together and divided them by 3. Like this I received the average price deviation per person.

….and the winner is: my friend Andreas, with whom I used to study at the university of Liechtenstein and who during many times had helped me big time by sharing his study notes and even better, his perfect summaries prior to exams we had to take! Congratulations Andreas! The average price deviation of his guesses was 3.61% – which is pretty amazing!

Maybe and just for the sake of it, the highest estimate for gold came from Rainer at 1’611, the lowest from Robert at 1’385. The highest estimate for Silver also came from Rainer at 20.56 and the lowest again from Robert at 16.37. The highest estimate for the S&P came from myself at 3’240 and the lowest from Scott at 2’623. Many thanks to all of you for participating. Maybe I will run another competition in 2020. Maybe in a year from now silver stands at USD 50 or 100 and thus it will be even more interesting to participate in the competition.

As always, Ladies and Gentlemen, please share your comments, remarks, suggestions with me, but please don’t forget (instead of hitting the reply button) to send your messages to:

smk@incrementum.li

Many thanks, indeed!

And now, Ladies and Gentlemen I wish you a great day and weekend.

Kind regards.

Yours truly,

Stefan M. Kremeth
Wealth Management
Incrementum AG

Tel.: +423 237 26 60
Cell: +41 79 303 48 39
Im alten Riet 102
9494 Schaan/Liechtenstein
Mail: smk@incrementum.li
Web: www.incrementum.li

Gold in the Age of Eroding Trust

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen
 
They did it again! As every year, my partners Ronni Stöferle and Mark Valek have invested a considerable amount of time into what we believe to be the most extensive research piece that has ever been written on gold.
 
The narrative of this year’s edition is “Gold in the Age of Eroding Trust” and how the widespread as well as multi-facetted erosion of trust affects gold and may affect the price of gold. Among others, the following topics are covered this year:

  • Review of the most important events in the gold market over the past 12 months 
  • “The Monetary U-Turn” and its impact on the gold price
  • The increasing importance of gold as reserve asset in a time of de-dollarization
  • Gold stocks: reasons for our confidence (ESG, technology, valuation)
  • Outlook for gold price development 

Further highlights of the report include exclusive interviews and guest contributions from and with many well-known personalities, such as Jim Rogers or Prof. Steve Hanke.
 
In the following please find the download links for all editions of the report:
 
English version:
Extended Version – English (340 pages) 
Compact Version – English (100 pages) 

Please feel free to share our Incrementum In Gold we Trust report with family, friends, and colleagues.
 
If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact my partner Ronni Stöferle under: rps@incrementum.li 

Enjoy the reading, Ladies and Gentlemen and have a great day and weekend. 

Kind regards.
 
Yours truly, Stefan M. Kremeth
Wealth Management
Incrementum AG

There is no magic!

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen

There is no magic! Financial well-being and prosperity need a minimum amount of economic growth.

You know, I received a fair amount of positive feedback to Anton’s article on increased productivity and economic growth thanks to cheap and all time readily available (fossil) energy and again, Ladies and Gentlemen, there is no magic, economic growth demands cheap and 24/7 readily available energy.

… and without economic growth, large parts of populations will not be able of keeping their standard of living on current levels and even less of increasing it, unfortunately there is no magic there either.

I believe if large parts of a population feel economic pressure, eventually those people will want to vent their feelings, and this may lead to unpredictable and inconvenient consequences. The yellow vests movement in France is only one very recent example right in front of our doorsteps.

The cost of such protests is enormous and, there is again no magic, will have to be borne by the country’s population. While the wealthier cohort will not really feel any impact, it is a twist of fate that the less fortunate cohort, the ones that are in the street protesting for a better life, will be hurt even more over time through indirect tax increases, inflation, general increase in cost of living.

The question for me and my readers is how to invest in such an environment. I firmly believe there is again no magic. If you want to have some sort of cash return on your assets in a 0% or negative interest environment, you can get it by accepting volatility. If you are ready to accept volatility you can have easily 4% – 5% cash return on your investments. But volatility is not for everyone. People get very quickly very nervous. Long term statistics show that equities beat bonds but the price you pay for the extra performance of equities over bonds is volatility. No magic, Ladies and Gentlemen! I don’t mind volatility; I prefer low volatility to high volatility, but I don’t really mind it that much.

Besides equities, where do you want to invest your money and receive a cash return if not in equities?

What is your opinion, Ladies and Gentlemen, as Anton did, please share your thoughts, ideas and/or experiences with me and my readers, but please don’t forget (instead of hitting the reply button) to send your messages to:

smk@incrementum.li

Many thanks, indeed!

And now, Ladies and Gentlemen I wish you a great day and weekend.

Kind regards.

Yours truly,

Stefan M. Kremeth
Wealth Management
Incrementum AG

Inescapable Realities of Prosperity

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen
 
One of my readers sent me a link to an article he published on LinkedIn. I think the article is fundamentally sound, proposes some of his very personal interesting ideas and assumptions and is well written. I have thus asked him permission to publish his article or the link to his article in my weekly mail and was granted that. Thank you very much for sharing your knowledge and thoughts, Anton!
 
Now, the original title of the article is: “Energy, Productivity & Debt – Inescapable Realities of Prosperity” and the original article with some illustrating charts and graphs can be found under the following link:
 
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/energy-productivity-debt-inescapable-realities-anton-f-balint/
 
I highly recommend reading the original article. However, one or the other passage may need some second reading especially for non-native English speakers, I think it is worth it.
 
What is your opinion, Ladies and Gentlemen, as Anton did, please share your thoughts, ideas and/or experiences with me and my readers, but please don’t forget (instead of hitting the reply button) to send your messages to:
 
smk@incrementum.li
 
Many thanks, indeed!
 
And now, Ladies and Gentlemen I wish you a great day and weekend.
Kind regards.

Yours truly,

Stefan M. Kremeth
Wealth Management
Incrementum AG

In Gold we Trust

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen
 
I am happy to announce that our yearly report “In Gold we Trust” on monetary policies and gold will be published on May 28, 2019. Please have a look at our website and maybe even the teaser video we produced under the following link:
 
https://ingoldwetrust.report/
 
You may be sure to find many interesting charts and stories, illustrating known and lesser known aspects of the special situation of monetary policies we’re in for so many years already and which will last for some more time I suppose.
 
In my humble and slightly bias opinion we can be certain that Ronni, Mark and their helping colleagues have been digging into the dirt to bring to light facts usually not covered by mainstream media.
 
Another 18 days and Incrementum’s 2019 “In Gold we Trust” report will be published, this year for the first time in Chinese, next to English and German.
 
Ladies and Gentlemen, in anticipation of our Incrementum “In Gold we Trust” report I wish you a great day and weekend.
 
Kind regards,
 
Yours truly,

Stefan M. Kremeth
Wealth Management
Incrementum AG