Capital Returns Unveiled: The Double-Edged Sword of Successic

Good Morning Ladies and Gentlemen


”Observe calmly; secure our position; cope with affairs calmly; hide our capacities and bide our time; be good at maintaining a low profile; and never claim leadership.”

Deng Xiaoping

 

Entrepreneurs, organisations, and politicians often make significant errors during periods of notable success. Such advantageous phases can lead to complacency and overconfidence, which may obscure potential risks and foster an environment where critical decision-making processes are compromised. This phenomenon suggests that a heightened sense of achievement may inadvertently trigger detrimental decision-making practices, ultimately affecting the sustainability of any organisation’s success.

Capital Returns

The core theory of capital returns suggests that capital tends to flow toward businesses that generate high returns and retreat when returns fall below the cost of capital. This process is not static but cyclical and marked by continuous fluctuations. The influx of capital encourages new investments, which, over time, expand capacity within the sector and eventually cause a decline in returns. Conversely, when returns are low, capital exits, leading to a decrease in capacity. This reduction eventually paves the way for a rebound in profitability, which in turn attracts capital once again, restarting the cycle.

Periods of Pronounced Success

Reflecting on the introductory text and evaluating which companies are presently thriving and how they are likely to utilise the funds they receive, I cannot help but feel that, given the massive investments in AI, a few companies might be overstepping their bounds. Additionally, recalling our discussion on capital returns theory from the previous section, I conclude that we may wish to avoid companies that currently seem invincible and are at the height of their success. Conversely, there may be promising opportunities among companies undergoing challenging phases, experiencing declining margins, and in need of restructuring or streamlining their business operations, i.e., entities that may not yet be on the radar of analysts and asset managers. What is your point of view?

Food for Thought

With today’s quote, Deng Xiaoping once advised: to observe calmly; secure one’s position; manage affairs with composure; conceal one’s abilities and bide one’s time; excel at maintaining a low profile; and never to seek leadership. This philosophy wasn’t just rhetoric; it was the blueprint for China’s remarkable transformation. Under Deng’s steady hand, China shifted toward capitalism and, in doing so, lifted an astonishing 500 million people out of poverty.

Yet, this long-term, strategic vision stands in stark contrast to the short-term, reactive tactics often seen in countries that have already reached their peak. Where some leaders chase quick wins and make frequent course corrections, Deng’s approach was characterised by patience, discipline, and a relentless focus on the bigger picture.

But such a strategy is not without its price. The Chinese model’s success came at the cost of limited political participation; a reminder that every path to prosperity involves trade-offs. As always, there is no free lunch, Ladies and Gentlemen.

Ladies and Gentlemen

Feel free to send your messages to smk@incrementum.li. Many thanks, indeed!

I wish you an excellent start to the day and weekend!

Yours truly,

Stefan M. Kremeth
CEO & Head of Wealth Management
Incrementum AG – we love managing assets

Tel.: +423 237 26 60
Cell: +41 79 303 48 39
Im alten Riet 153
9494 Schaan/Liechtenstein
Mail: smk@incrementum.li

From U.S. Interest Rates to the Hidden Costs of Sanctions: A Quick Dive into Economic Dynamics

Good Morning Ladies and Gentlemen


”First class business in a first class way.”

Pierpont Morgan, Jr

 

Online search trends for “day trading class” have skyrocketed by 700% in the past three months, reaching an all-time high. In contrast, gold has experienced a remarkable increase of 58% in the calendar year 2025 thus far, marking the most considerable annual rise in this category. The previous record was set in 2007, which saw an increase of 31.9%. While gold demonstrated strong performance during the financial crisis of 2007-09, it suffered a significant decline of 27.3% in 2013 as expectations of tighter monetary policy emerged and the US economy began to show signs of recovery.

U.S. Interest Rates

The U.S. Federal Reserve took the anticipated action by lowering its benchmark interest rate by a quarter percentage point, bringing it to a new range of 3.75% to 4.00%. This marks the second reduction of 2025 and aligns with market expectations. Additionally, the Fed announced that it would cease the reduction of its asset portfolio starting December 1, effectively ending a process that began in 2022. However, the decision was not unanimous; Fed Director Stephen Miran, a close advisor to President Donald Trump, advocated for a more substantial cut, similar to his stance in September. Conversely, monetary policymaker Jeffrey Schmid opposed the easing due to concerns over rising inflation. Fed Chair Powell tempered market expectations regarding any further rate cuts in December. Plenty of different perspectives.

The Hidden Cost of Sanctions

In the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Western world imposed sanctions with the intent of instigating regime change. Fast forward four years, and these sanctions have failed to achieve that goal. In fact, the Russian president has solidified his grip on power more than ever, bolstered by an increasingly repressive autocratic regime. Meanwhile, the countries that implemented these sanctions have witnessed a wave of political shifts, trending from liberal to more conservative governments, and an evolution continues to unfold. This situation suggests that not only do sanctions fail to produce the desired impact, but they may also lead to unintended political repercussions in the very nations that impose them. Ladies and Gentlemen, this is not a new phenomenon. We have observed this pattern repeatedly, yet it seems new generations of politicians must still learn this lesson for themselves.

Are Politicians Smart?

The challenge is not that politicians need to be the most intelligent individuals; rather, it lies in their ability to communicate their ideologies engagingly to potential voters. Unfortunately, uncomfortable truths often lack widespread support, leading to misleading statements from all sides. As a result, many nations are burdened with substantial debt and grappling with budget deficits. To address the core issue, while not all politicians may possess a sharp intellect, likely, voters are often even less informed. People tend to be conditioned by politicians and their parties, reminiscent of Ivan Pavlov’s classical conditioning experiment.

Classical Conditioning

Classical conditioning is a behavioural learning theory that illustrates how behaviours can be acquired through stimulus-response associations. Pavlov’s research shows that these connections can lead to the emergence of learned behaviours. This principle is frequently employed in politics as a strategy to secure electoral support. Politicians typically make a variety of pledges, including the creation of job opportunities, the reduction of tax burdens, the provision of free healthcare services, the implementation of complimentary public transportation, and the assurance of access to free education at both primary and tertiary institutions, among other incentives. The question of who will bear the cost of these promotions is frequently overlooked. As there is no magic, the result is the issue of emerging expenses and their management, which, unfortunately, does not receive the necessary attention under normal circumstances, leading to a continuous increase in budget deficits within countries and a rising debt ratio. Consequently, future generations are left to inherit growing levels of debt and its myriad challenges. Unfortunately, no free lunches exist, even if politicians want to make you believe that.

Ladies and Gentlemen

Feel free to send your messages to smk@incrementum.li. Many thanks, indeed!

I wish you an excellent start to the day and weekend!

Yours truly,

Stefan M. Kremeth
CEO & Head of Wealth Management
Incrementum AG – we love managing assets

Tel.: +423 237 26 60
Cell: +41 79 303 48 39
Im alten Riet 153
9494 Schaan/Liechtenstein
Mail: smk@incrementum.li

Quarterly Report for Private Clients: An Analytical Overview

Good Morning Ladies and Gentlemen


”It is time for a new generation of leadership to cope with new problems and new opportunities.”

John F. Kennedy

 

We prepare a comprehensive report for our private clients every quarter. As we transition into the fourth quarter and continue our established practice, I am pleased to share the latest quarterly report, which was sent to our clients.

„Dear Customers

The third quarter of 2025 was once again very positive for us all. Our private clients‘ portfolios continue to perform well and show resilience, enabling us to reduce risk in some areas and build up cash positions.

As always, please read this quarterly report carefully. It contains important information about the current situation and the outlook.

September Event Recap.

In September, we enjoyed a wonderful late summer’s day with our clients on an exciting city tour that explored the history of money in Zurich. The tour focused on historical facts about money, the history of money lenders in Zurich, and the question of what the silk industry has to do with banks.

After the tour, we had the opportunity to discuss what we had heard and seen over drinks and snacks at the historic James Joyce Pub before moving on to the traditional Kaufleuten restaurant for dinner and to round off the evening.

The Path to Higher Inflation

In developed economies, the near future will be increasingly shaped by demographic change, increased defence spending, changes in global supply chains, the construction and expansion of ever larger data centres, and the question of generating affordable and, if possible, sustainable energy. Expected increases in government deficits are likely to play a role in this. The changes in these areas will lead to increased capital requirements and, as a result, higher costs for borrowers. The combination of higher capital requirements, higher borrowing costs and government deficits will lead to higher tax burdens and, with an unavoidable delay, higher inflation.

Why is this important, you may ask?

Additions to an Article on the Stock Market Boom from The Wall Street Journal

This is important because it will influence our investment behaviour. A journalist recently addressed this topic in The Wall Street Journal. Today’s boom, or, if you will, the bubble surrounding artificial intelligence. In our view, this boom has much in common with its predecessors, such as the leveraged buyouts of the 1980s, dot-com stocks in the 1990s and the property market in the 2000s. Each of these bubbles featured stocks of companies with dizzying valuations, easy and sometimes relatively cheap credit for risky borrowers, and trendy new financial products.
But something feels different today than it did back then. The wave of speculation has spread far beyond the usual stocks, bonds and real estate. Cryptocurrencies, a brand-new asset class, have now reached a value of around $4 trillion. According to the American Gaming Association, Americans bet $150 billion on sports last year, a 24% increase over 2023. Gold, a hedge against bubbles, seems to be in a bubble itself. Speculation is now firmly embedded in the political, economic and cultural psyche. Instead of opposing speculation, official Washington is actually promoting it. The Federal Reserve is lowering interest rates, not without political pressure. The current US administration is loosening regulations on the entire financial system, and the president’s family is benefiting from this. I am not writing this to moralise, but to show how much the environment has changed quickly. Speculators buy products with no intrinsic value or connection to a productive asset, and their prices are being pushed into new spheres.

But just as with any bubble, a few seem particularly aware of these risks. Warren Buffett addressed this issue in what may be his last letter to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders.
While many wonder why he has built up a record cash position in recent years by reducing his stock holdings for eleven consecutive quarters, he has been quite transparent about it. For him, some parameters no longer add up. So, for risk reasons, he prefers to hold an increased cash position, allowing him to increase existing positions and enter into new ones in the event of setbacks.

We take a similar view. We buy in areas where we can expect solid cash flows in the coming years and reduce positions that no longer meet our valuation criteria.

Our Own Products

We are often asked why we do not include our own products in private client portfolios. The reason lies in the question of governance, i.e., whether and to what extent an asset manager or bank should use its own products at all. Those who use their own products generally do so for financial reasons. Own products can generate additional income. Well, we have always believed that it is inappropriate to fill private client portfolios with strategies managed by our asset management.

Conclusion

We buy dividend stocks on weak days and sell shares in companies whose valuations have reached their ceiling on strong days. We are patient and invest for the long term.

As noted in the past, markets fluctuate, but our responsibility remains the same.

Passive income

We endeavour to build portfolios that are somewhat less volatile than the markets and can recover as quickly as possible after slumps, while always showing a reasonably stable dividend yield and thus generating a solid passive income within the scope of the invested assets. We have managed to do this quite well so far. Despite the financial crisis of 2008, the Covid-19 pandemic, the war between Russia and Ukraine, the oil crisis (when the price of crude oil on the futures markets was negative, i.e. investors received money when they bought oil because there was not enough global storage capacity for oil already produced due to a slump in demand), the gas and oil crisis following the Russian attack and the resulting sanctions against Russia and the subsequent very sharp rise in fossil fuel prices, the inflation and subsequent interest rate shock, the property crisis in China, global political uncertainties, the prophecies of doom regarding the abolition of the USD or the ultimate banking crash, or the dissolution of the EU, the euro, etc. Our portfolios have proven resilient during all of these crises. This resilience comes at a price. The price is the lower return compared to more aggressive portfolios, which, in certain situations, enable significant gains but often plummet during crises and remain stuck at the bottom for a long time. On the other hand, the growth in our portfolios also comes at a price compared to a zero return on savings. The price for this is measured in the short-term volatility of our portfolios compared to the low volatility of savings deposits.

Our investment approach: cash flows / passive income / purchasing power

With our investment approach, we endeavour to invest in companies that can generate mostly positive cash flows over the business cycle with their intrinsic business model and are willing to share them with their investors.
Our universe is regionally limited primarily to Europe and Switzerland. We do not invest directly in the USA, but a third-party product may cover US exposure. In terms of sectors, we want to be flexible and invest across most sectors, but we have never invested in banks to date.
We also try to invest directly wherever possible and sensibly. In other words, we buy the shares of company XYZ directly and avoid investing in investment funds, as these generally increase the portfolio’s overall costs. In return, we accept a lower level of diversification and possibly higher short-term volatility.
We always measure the weightings of the individual positions in the portfolios we manage as a percentage. Therefore, you will probably never see an even number of shares in an investment. We believe optimum portfolio weightings are between 1% and 5%. If a position is below 1%, it will either be liquidated entirely sooner or later or built up to over 1%. Positions above 5% are trimmed back sooner or later. When adjusting to a position, we consider the market environment, outlook, dividend yield, valuation ratios, etc., and often take our time to change the 1% – 5% rule. It is always essential to us that you understand this investment approach, which should also be in your interest. If you are unsure about our approach, don’t hesitate to contact us, and we will be happy to explain what this approach is all about. In the past, we have found that our approach has led to favourable long-term performance and purchasing power retention thanks to the compound interest effect.

The frequency of our reporting (repetition)

As we have welcomed new clients, I would like to discuss our report briefly. We are obliged by supervisory law to report every quarter. At least in part, this is done for us by the respective custodian bank at the end of each quarter with its quarterly statements. We therefore do not usually send out our reporting at the end of a quarter, as our clients can already view a quarterly statement from the Custodian Bank on their online banking tool. We prefer to report between the ends of the quarters, but we do not commit ourselves to a specific date. Instead, we are somewhat guided by our agendas and ask for your understanding. In the first half of the year, the annual financial statements, the audit of the annual financial statements by the Financial Market Authority, the Annual General Meeting, two Board meetings, the internal audit and then the regulatory audit by the Financial Market Authority determine the timetable. There will be fewer time-consuming administrative activities in the year’s second half.

Relevant changes with the defined investor and risk profile

As we do every quarter, we must point out that this report contains the suitability test required by Art. 19 Para. 2 of the Asset Management Act through the allocation ranges shown in the supplementary information. The allocation ranges reflect strategy definition based on the jointly developed investor and risk profile. We thus continuously review, among other things, the investment objectives and preferences we have jointly defined. Suppose the defined bandwidths are adhered to, or there is only a slight deviation due to market or value conditions. In that case, the portfolio in Annexe 2 of the asset management contract is suitable. As always, however, we request that you contact us immediately if there are any relevant changes on your part concerning the defined investor and risk profile. Please also note that a detailed breakdown of the costs of the mandate for the past year can be found in the year-end statement from Bank Julius Baer, and the anticipated future expenses for the mandate can be found in the enclosed list and visualisation of the expected total costs of an asset management mandate with Incrementum AG.

Thank you very much

Thank you, dear clients, for your trust in my/our deliberations and in what we do. I hope I have given you insight into your asset manager’s mindset. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. We will be happy to try to answer them.

Now my partners and I wish you a wonderful fall with all our hearts.

Stay healthy, and I hope to see you soon!

Best wishes”

Ladies and Gentlemen

Feel free to send your messages to smk@incrementum.li. Many thanks, indeed!

I wish you an excellent start to the day and weekend!

Yours truly,

Stefan M. Kremeth
CEO & Head of Wealth Management
Incrementum AG – we love managing assets

Tel.: +423 237 26 60
Cell: +41 79 303 48 39
Im alten Riet 153
9494 Schaan/Liechtenstein
Mail: smk@incrementum.li

Update: 2025 Year-End Competition

Good Morning Ladies and Gentlemen


”That is very, very unusual; since 2005, only the rebounds after the Global Financial Crisis and Covid-19 have had bigger five-month rallies — and they both followed much deeper initial selloffs.”

John Authers

 

As the prices of precious metals have increased substantially, interest rates have exhibited remarkable stability. On the other hand, the US dollar has demonstrated a significant weakening, potentially resulting in imported inflation. Interesting, no?

Silver

Wow, Ladies and Gentlemen, Silver stands at USD 54.12. Who would have thought? Obviously, no modifications have been made to our „betting landscape“. Hans holds the highest bid at USD 47.80, while Mark has submitted the lowest bid at USD 35.77. If Silver performs the way it did the last few weeks, Hans will be way off and still take that one home on December 31, 2025.

Shanghai Composite

The Shanghai Composite stands at 3’916. Mark is in the lead, and Hans is positioned in second. Hans submitted the highest bid at 3’980 points, marginally higher, approximately five points, than the corresponding bid submitted by Mark. In stark contrast, Niklas’s lowest recorded bid stands at 2’950 points.

10-Year U.S. Treasury

The 10-year U.S. Treasury trades at 4.03%. I am surprised to see that interest rates are so low. I would have expected current trade policies to lead to much higher inflation and thus interest rates. Maybe this is still to come, but my assumption was wrong so far. Anyway, in the 10-year U.S. Treasury securities market, Mike has the highest recorded bet at 5.55%, while Hans maintains the lowest at 3.8%. To me, this is still the most interesting bet. I am curious if we will see inflation kick in before year-end.

Ladies and Gentlemen

Feel free to send your messages to smk@incrementum.li. Many thanks, indeed!

I wish you an excellent start to the day and weekend!

Yours truly,

Stefan M. Kremeth
CEO & Head of Wealth Management
Incrementum AG – we love managing assets

Tel.: +423 237 26 60
Cell: +41 79 303 48 39
Im alten Riet 153
9494 Schaan/Liechtenstein
Mail: smk@incrementum.li

Hype Eventually Meets Reality and Fluctuating Fortunes Versus Stability in Uncertainty

Good Morning Ladies and Gentlemen


”Rapid revenue growth tomorrow is the only reason investors are willing to look past falling free cash flows today.”

Jesse Felder

 

While market sentiment and market valuations are essential considerations, one can also quantify price movements themselves and their potential implications. A recent study from Harvard revealed that when a sector surpasses the overall stock market by 150% over two years, the likelihood of experiencing a 40% crash increases to as much as 80%.

Is AI the Definition of a Bubble?

Recently, I came across a projection stating that total AI capital expenditures in the U.S. are expected to surpass USD 500 billion in 2026 and 2027, comparable to Singapore’s annual GDP. In contrast, The Wall Street Journal has reported that American consumers currently spend only USD12 billion annually on AI services, roughly equivalent to Somalia’s GDP. When you consider the stark economic differences between Singapore and Somalia, it becomes clear just how vast the divide is between the ambitious vision for AI and its current reality. Quite intriguing, is it not? Oh, yes, Bloomberg coined this a “buy first, ask questions later“ rally.

Probably, But Not Only

Independent power producers and the semiconductor sector, in particular, have emerged as significant beneficiaries of the ongoing AI capital expenditure bubble. However, eventually, results will need to align with expectations, which could lead to a rude awakening. This will affect not only AI stocks, AI-ETFs, and AI options but also many other risk assets, including cryptocurrencies. The current level of leverage surpasses anything we’ve witnessed in the past. Based on my experiences over the last 38 years in my professional career, this situation appears unsustainable.

Is there a Safe Heaven

Yes, absolutely, short-term government bonds in your reference currency are an option. However, in all major currency regions, inflation is exceeding the interest rates on those government bonds, which means that in real terms, such an investment is losing value, albeit less than what we might anticipate during a market downturn. There is no free lunch!

Crude Oil

I am frequently asked about the crude oil sector, which can generate impressive cash flows and appears to be free from a bubble. However, it may be premature to make significant investments at this time. U.S. shale drillers, for example, are currently facing rising tungsten prices, a rare and exceptionally hard metal crucial for industrial tools like drill bits. This increase is largely due to Chinese export controls that have restricted supply, presenting a potential risk to U.S. fossil fuel production. Tungsten accounts for up to 75% of the drill bits used in oil fields, and China dominates global production, controlling over two-thirds of the supply. Additionally, as a result of the current U.S. administration’s tariff policies, China has become reluctant to increase tungsten sales or offer it at reduced prices. The elevated tariffs on other commodities, such as steel, which is also widely used in U.S. oil fields, further strain the profit margins of suppliers in the energy sector.
Moreover, crude oil prices remain suppressed due to the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine. The low prices for oil and gas are adversely affecting the Russian economy, compelling oil-producing nations to politically motivated levels of production that exceed what would be sustainable at current price points. The certainly not entirely unintended consequence of this „tactical intervention“ is lower energy prices for both households and industries.

Conclusion

I am surprised that markets hold up so well. If the market crashes, there are not many safe havens. Last but not least, one should always remember what Bernard Baruch, one of the few who avoided the 1929 stock market crash, famously said: “I made my money by selling too soon”.

Ladies and Gentlemen

Feel free to send your messages to smk@incrementum.li. Many thanks, indeed!

I wish you an excellent start to the day and weekend!

Yours truly,

Stefan M. Kremeth
CEO & Head of Wealth Management
Incrementum AG – we love managing assets

Tel.: +423 237 26 60
Cell: +41 79 303 48 39
Im alten Riet 153
9494 Schaan/Liechtenstein
Mail: smk@incrementum.li

Economic and Corporate Landscape and Some Trends

Good Morning Ladies and Gentlemen


”No matter how many warnings are issued or how many laws are written, people will find new ways to believe that the good times can last forever.”

Andrew Ross Sorkin

 

The equally weighted S&P 500 index has exhibited a sideways movement since the conclusion of July. In contrast, the traditional S&P 500 index has demonstrated a significant upward trajectory during the same period. This divergence in performance indicates that a select group of equities, often referred to as the „magnificent seven“, have been pivotal in driving the overall dynamics of the U.S. stock market.

Economic Landscape and Custom Duties

Numerous developed nations‘ economic landscapes are currently exhibiting suboptimal performance. The United States‘ situation is no different. However, it experienced robust economic growth leading up to 2025’s commencement and still benefits from it.
Customs duties are an additional tax obligation imposed by governments on imported goods, functioning similarly to tax mechanisms. Consequently, an increase in value-added tax (VAT), for example, would have a similar impact on consumers, probably leading to higher costs for goods and services.

Economic Landscape and Supply Changes

Despite the challenges presented by tariffs both threatened and implemented by the United States, global supply chains appear to have stabilised. A key contributing factor to this resilience may be attributed to the strategic realignment and adjustment of supply chains undertaken by many companies in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The necessity for a diversified approach to sourcing during this period has fostered enhanced robustness within these supply chains.

Corporate Indebtness

In the aftermath of the financial crisis, many corporations have substantially reduced their levels of indebtedness, demonstrating a tendency towards deleveraging and prudent financial management. This shift indicates a strategic move away from excessive leverage, allowing firms to strengthen their balance sheets and enhance overall financial stability.

Government Indebtness

While France is often cited as a negative example of government debt in Europe, and it indeed has its own debt challenges, it is important to recognise that France has refinanced its debt during periods of low interest rates by issuing long-term government bonds at these low rates. As a result, France is less affected by short-term interest rate fluctuations. In contrast, the situation in the United States is quite different. Since the financial crisis, government debt has increasingly been refinanced on a short-, to very short-term basis. Therefore, the dependence on short-term interest rates in the U.S. is a critical factor that cannot be overlooked.

Conclusion I

After the recent and hefty increase, I would not be surprised by a trend away from tangible assets towards productive assets. Other than that, the three major trends are demography, technology, and changes in global politics, which will continue to accompany us.

Conclusion II

Oh yes, and one last one, I could well imagine that if the Supreme Court were to declare customs duties unconstitutional and subsequently abolish them, it could potentially precipitate significant disruptions in the American bond market. Do not get me wrong, I think tariffs are generally bad for the economy and especially for consumers; however, the market has accepted this new reality, and any new changes would likely lead to an even greater loss of trust than already experienced.

Ladies and Gentlemen

Feel free to send your messages to smk@incrementum.li. Many thanks, indeed!

I wish you an excellent start to the day and weekend!

Yours truly,

Stefan M. Kremeth
CEO & Head of Wealth Management
Incrementum AG – we love managing assets

Tel.: +423 237 26 60
Cell: +41 79 303 48 39
Im alten Riet 153
9494 Schaan/Liechtenstein
Mail: smk@incrementum.li

Two Kinds of Gold; Concluding Article in our Series on Wealth

Good Morning Ladies and Gentlemen


”To love or have loved, that is enough. Ask nothing further. There exists no other pearl to be discovered within the dark folds of life.”

Victor Hugo, Les Misérables

 

Welcome to the concluding article in our series on the intriguing topic of wealth. In our previous three articles, we have examined wealth from philosophical, metaphysical, and cultural perspectives, notably through the lens of literature. We have aimed to illuminate the multifaceted nature of wealth. This article will serve as the final chapter in our exploration, and as with the first three parts, Anton provided the text while I handled the editing.

A recent piece by DE Shaw made a compelling observation regarding wealth and its most traditional symbol: gold. In “https://www.deshaw.com/library/worth-its-weight”, the authors noted, “The growth rate of gold’s aggregate value should, over ultra-long horizons, correspond with the rate of global wealth growth.”

As one might expect, the paper refers to material wealth. Interestingly, the growth rate of wealth could be (or ought to be) mirrored in the growth rate of gold’s value. The reason why this is interesting comes once more from the article. The authors ask: “Where does the value of gold come from?”, and they answer: “[…] society has deemed [it] valuable and reasonably secure over time.”

What is not clear from DE Shaw’s piece is whether the increase in material wealth was first followed by society’s collective assent that the value of gold should represent this growth, or if it was the other way around: society deemed gold to have value, and because of this consensus, the changes in its value were taken to reflect fluctuations in material wealth. This sort of thinking may seem a tad pedantic. However, language is essential, and details matter in getting to the root of things. If we take aside the term “society”, it is impossible not to ask: What does it actually mean when we say that “society” has deemed something? It must be a metaphor for some consensus.

Unlike the scientific consensus that the earth is round, based on tested observations, the consensus underpinning the value of gold is different. Remember what we said in the first article: “value is intrinsically linked to perceptions, human psychology, economic activity, and legal systems.”

In other words, if we apply our observation on value to DE Shaw’s statement above, we shall have something like this: The changes in perceptions, human psychology, economic activity, and laws should reflect, over long time periods, the changes in material wealth. If we agree with the authors of the above article, most people will agree with this link. Once more, we can see how multifaceted the concept of wealth is. However, so far, we have spoken only of material wealth. As we argued in the previous article, in which we explored wealth from a cultural perspective through the lens of literary works, wealth goes beyond the material elements.

An interesting exercise would be to consider what benchmarks we may use to measure how much we value relationships like friendship and family and virtues like honour and honesty. If the value of gold is to be a benchmark for material wealth, how could we measure non-material wealth? Would there also be a societal consensus about these measurements?

Perhaps our personal happiness and fulfilment in life are the benchmarks for wealth? If we are to take the studies highlighted by the American Psychological Association, then our own happiness is a benchmark for the wealth that friendship relationships bless us with. And if we are to take Plato’s words, as recorded in “The Republic” and “Philebus”, then indeed a person of virtue would be a happy, wealthy man or woman. For Plato, true happiness was impossible without virtue.

However, studies show that people, especially the young, are increasingly less happy despite growth in material wealth. For example, the recent World Happiness Report found this to be true in the United States. Meanwhile, young and old Americans have gotten materially wealthier, at least according to a recent article by the New York Times. We can see a similar trend across other nations if we dig further.

Why this apparent discrepancy between happiness and richness? Material wealth growth also means immaterial wealth growth, if happiness is a benchmark for the latter. However, that point differs from individual to individual because lifestyles and consumption habits are not the same for all. The conclusive point is that there is a point in a person’s life when more material wealth does not mean more happiness.

Throughout this series, we have essentially tried to argue that there is more than one kind of gold by looking at the concept of wealth more deeply. There is the tangible asset, labelled DE Shaw with the acronym NPSOV (which, despite its unfriendly look, stands for non-productive store of value). Then there is the intangible asset, the invisible type of gold: friendship, virtue, love.

Dare I say it is the latter kind of intangible gold that ought to be valued more? After all, what good is it to have all the world’s riches but nobody to share it with?

For the world to be truly wealthy, material possessions will not suffice; the voice of the world’s greatest literary authors from ancient times to today is in complete accord. The reason for this is that wealth is closely linked to the nature of the human person, as we have argued in the second article of this series, and the human person needs more than material possessions to feel (and to be) truly wealthy: we need one another, we need love.

Thank you all for reading.

Ladies and Gentlemen

Feel free to send your messages to smk@incrementum.li. Many thanks, indeed!

I wish you an excellent start to the day and weekend!

Yours truly,

Stefan M. Kremeth
CEO & Head of Wealth Management
Incrementum AG – we love managing assets

Tel.: +423 237 26 60
Cell: +41 79 303 48 39
Im alten Riet 153
9494 Schaan/Liechtenstein
Mail: smk@incrementum.li

From Interest Rate Cuts to Constraints in Diplomacy

Good Morning Ladies and Gentlemen


”In the real world, nothing happens at the right place and time. It is the job of journalists and historians to correct that.”

Mark Twain 

 

The Financial Times reported that for individuals purchasing health insurance in the U.S. through government exchanges, the median increase in 2026 is 18%, more than double last year’s rise of 7%. Simultaneously, we’ve received the most significant negative revision to U.S. employment statistics, with nearly a million jobs adjusted downward.

Rate Cuts by the U.S. Federal Reserve

On Wednesday, the US Federal Reserve reduced interest rates by a quarter of a percentage point, bringing the new range to 4.00% to 4.25%, which investors anticipated. This marks the first change in interest rates since December 2024. During the announcement, Jerome Powell described the decision as a ‚risk management rate cut‘. The Fed also signalled expectations for two additional rate cuts of 25 basis points each at its upcoming meetings in October and December, a forecast supported by market expectations. Looking at the two-year U.S. Treasuries, the Fed seems to be still behind the curve. Why is this the case, you may ask?

The Fed’s Dual Mandate

Powell reiterated the Fed’s dual mandate of maintaining price stability and supporting the labour market, describing the balancing act as challenging given that inflation remains above the target level. The target inflation rate is 2%, but the current rate is 2.9%. This is probably the best explanation for why the Fed still seems behind the curve. Regarding inflation, examining grocery item price fluctuations reveals significant year-over-year increases in various categories. For instance, coffee has experienced a remarkable escalation of 20.9%, while steaks have risen by 16.6%. Furthermore, apples and bananas have seen increases of 9.6% and 6.6%, respectively. Notably, these price adjustments occur although less than 50% of tariff-related costs have been transmitted to consumers thus far. This trend underscores the complexities of supply chain dynamics and consumer pricing in the current economic landscape.

Future Interest Rate Path in the U.S.

A likely future interest path in the U.S. Looking ahead to 2026, the Federal Reserve anticipates only a single rate cut, while the futures market predicts three. Following Wednesday’s 25 basis point cut, the market has assigned high probabilities of 88% and 82% for further rate reductions in October and December, respectively.

The Bank of England

The Bank of England, in contrast, chose not to lower interest rates during today’s meeting, citing persistently high inflation in the UK. The monetary authorities maintained the key rate at 4.00%. Nonetheless, the decision by the Bank of England’s (BoE) Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) sparked internal controversy, with seven members voting for the decision and two against it. Monetary policymakers Swati Dhingra and Alan Taylor advocated for a rate cut. Following the easing measures implemented in August, the BoE refrained from taking additional steps, largely due to ongoing inflationary pressures. Central bank governor Andrew Bailey remarked, „We expect inflation to return to our 2% target, but we are not out of the woods yet. Any future cuts must, therefore, be gradual and cautious“.

Today’s Quote

Today’s quote, “In the real world, nothing happens at the right place and time. It is the job of journalists and historians to correct that,” carries a significant philosophical weight. Was Mark Twain being cynical, ignorant, or far-sighted? Personally, I believe that, unfortunately, in many instances, journalists prioritise moral-ethical arguments over pure fact-based reporting. In political discourse, I seek less personal opinion and more factual information, but I rarely find it. Conversely, political leaders and journalists seem increasingly willing to dismiss anything that does not align with their narrative. I find this troubling, as the absence of freedom of expression stifles political competition and constrains diplomacy. This is a precarious situation because, in a democratic environment, diplomacy serves as a means of civilising conflict and revolution. Think about it.

Next Week

Next week, we will publish the fourth and final instalment of our four-article series, which has been unfolding over the summer. In collaboration with my friend Anton, who resides in Oxford (UK) and works in the financial services sector, we have been examining the familiar term “wealth” to gain a deeper understanding of its meaning.

Ladies and Gentlemen

Feel free to send your messages to smk@incrementum.li. Many thanks, indeed!

I wish you an excellent start to the day and weekend!

Yours truly

Stefan M. Kremeth
CEO & Head of Wealth Management
Incrementum AG – we love managing assets

Tel.: +423 237 26 60
Cell: +41 79 303 48 39
Im alten Riet 153
9494 Schaan/Liechtenstein
Mail: smk@incrementum.li

2025 Year-End Competition; an Update

Good Morning Ladies and Gentlemen


”The greatest mistake you can make in life is to be continually fearing you will make one.”

Elbert Hubbard 

 

The first article in our series exploring a broader conceptualisation of wealth was published in Executive Global Magazine. Just in case you feel like spending a moment reading it, feel free to click on the following link:

A Philosophical Approach To Wealth – Part I – Incrementum

Update

Anyway, I thought it would be a good time to provide an update on the Incrementum 2025 Year-End Competition. As I write this edition of „Stefan’s Weekly,“ the prices are as follows: silver is USD 41.49, the Shanghai Composite is 3,812.22 points, and the 10-year U.S. Treasury yields 4.12%.

Silver

No modifications have been made to our „betting landscape“ thus far. Hans continues to hold the highest bid at USD 47.80, while Mark has submitted the lowest bid at USD 35.77. If Silver performs the way it did the last few weeks, Hans will take that one home on December 31, 2025.                 

Shanghai Composite

The same principle applies to the Shanghai Composite Index, where my associate, Hans, submitted the highest bid at 3’980 points, marginally higher, approximately five points, than the corresponding bid submitted by Mark. In stark contrast, Niklas’s lowest recorded bid stands at 2’950 points.

10-Year U.S. Treasury  

In the 10-year U.S. Treasury securities market, Mike has the highest recorded bet at 5.55%, while Hans maintains the lowest at 3.8%. Again, this disparity highlights a significant divergence in the gentlemen’s expectations regarding future interest rates and, thus, economic conditions. To me, this is still the most interesting bet. I am curious if we will see inflation kick in before year-end.

Closed Competition

The competition has officially closed, and I appreciate your understanding.
Data will be sourced from https://marktdaten.fuw.ch/.

Fingers Crossed  

I’m keeping my fingers crossed for all participants, and I look forward to sending the winner this one-ounce silver coin at the end of the year.

Ladies and Gentlemen

Feel free to send your messages to smk@incrementum.li. Many thanks, indeed!

I wish you an excellent start to the day and weekend!

Yours truly,

Stefan M. Kremeth
CEO & Head of Wealth Management
Incrementum AG – we love managing assets

Tel.: +423 237 26 60
Cell: +41 79 303 48 39
Im alten Riet 153
9494 Schaan/Liechtenstein
Mail: smk@incrementum.li

Politics’ Possible Influence on Capital Expenditure

Good Morning Ladies and Gentlemen


”And I’ll keep my cool, but I’m feigning.”

Macy Gray in her iconic song “I Try”

 

An editor at the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung newspaper once coined the term ‘insufficiency terrorists’ (Insuffizienz-Terroristen) to describe a phenomenon. It refers to managers who fail to recognise their shortcomings and force those around them to adapt to their weaknesses. What causes frustration in companies and leads to economic decline becomes a national threat in the government apparatus. Incompetent ministry leadership can plunge an entire state into chaos.

A Slump in Corporate Earnings

Regrettably, we do not reside in a perfect world, and we acknowledge that. While many people remember the global financial crisis, they tend to overlook that from 2000 to 2002, corporate earnings fell by 40%, much like during the global financial crisis. The question is, why did this downturn happen?

The Reason

The primary cause of this downturn was the significant reduction in capital expenditure (capex) in 2001, which resulted in an immediate and sharp decline in earnings. When investment spending came to a halt, earnings followed suit without delay. Business leaders require a baseline of rule-based political and economic stability to feel assured that investments in new production facilities, infrastructure, information technology, and workforce development will yield positive returns over time. I am concerned that the current U.S. administration may be somewhat dogmatic regarding tariffs and may not fully recognise the associated economic risks.

Share Price Valuation

What do you think would occur with share prices, indices, and so on if corporate earnings were to decline significantly by 40%, similar to what happened 24 years ago? I assume that valuations would need to be recalibrated to reflect this new reality, which includes lower earnings and growth potential, potentially resulting in a contraction of the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio.

Futhermore

In addition, BCA (Bank Credit Analyst) Research asserts that tech-related capital expenditures have peaked. I strongly believe as of now, this perspective is not reflected in Nvidia’s current stock price. Analysts are predicting a 35% revenue growth over the next several years. As noted by The Financial Times, even if these projections are met, it remains challenging to justify the existing valuation: “If you sum the analysts’ estimates of free cash flows for the next five years and discount them back at a 10% rate, the total comes to only $650 billion. This implies that the remaining $3.8 trillion in enterprise value represents cash flow from 2030 onward.”

Conclusion

In response to the imperative for prudence and in recognition of the commendable performance demonstrated to date during the current fiscal year, we have implemented a strategic reconfiguration of the portfolio structure within our Private Client division. This adjustment encompasses the realisation of profits and a heightened allocation of liquid assets, aimed at mitigating the risks associated with what can be characterised as ‚insufficiency terrorism‘ in financial management.

Ladies and Gentlemen

Feel free to send your messages to smk@incrementum.li. Many thanks, indeed!

I wish you an excellent start to the day and weekend!

Yours truly,

Stefan M. Kremeth
CEO & Head of Wealth Management
Incrementum AG – we love managing assets

Tel.: +423 237 26 60
Cell: +41 79 303 48 39
Im alten Riet 153
9494 Schaan/Liechtenstein
Mail: smk@incrementum.li